Skip to content
Blockchain Posts

governance

GnosisDAO passes GIP-151, opens GNO treasury redemption

Snapshot closed GIP-151 on June 27 above 215% of quorum, authorising pro-rata redemption of GNO for the DAO's liquid treasury — over the cofounders' opposition.

by 5 min read
governancegnosisethereumdao

GnosisDAO's GIP-151 — the binding execution version of the activist-led treasury redemption proposal — closed on Snapshot on June 27, 2026 above the 75,000 GNO quorum, with the YES side carrying roughly 215% of the threshold. The proposal authorises a one-time, opt-in pro-rata redemption of GNO for a share of the DAO's liquid treasury, and reverses the outcome of the earlier signal vote on the same question. The primary source is the GnosisDAO Snapshot space and the GIP-150 forum thread where the activist authors first opened the debate in May.

What happened

GIP-150, posted in May and closed on Snapshot on June 1, asked GnosisDAO whether it should let GNO holders redeem a pro-rata share of the treasury. It was a signalling vote and it was rejected — 167,692 GNO For (27.86%), 432,545 GNO Against (71.87%), 1,611 GNO Abstain, across 95 voters. GnosisDAO's cofounders, Stefan George and Martin Koppelmann, voted against.

The activist sponsors — a group of redemption-focused stakeholders that crypto media tag as the "RFV Raiders", a label first applied to similar 2023 plays against Rook, FEI/Tribe and Aragon — reopened the question as GIP-151, a binding execution proposal rather than a signal. That vote closed on Snapshot on June 27 above the same 75,000 GNO quorum, carrying roughly 215% of the threshold by voting weight (~161,250 GNO) across 49 voters. A previously dormant whale wallet voted in favour and effectively tipped the result, reversing the June 1 outcome despite the cofounders restating their opposition.

The math the vote turns on

Per DeFiLlama, the GnosisDAO treasury is roughly $228 million in total. The composition published by the redemption authors and corroborated by independent trackers breaks down approximately as follows:

GnosisDAO treasury — ~$228M total (DeFiLlama)
- Majors (ETH, BTC, blue-chip)        : ~$68M
- Stablecoins                         : ~$22M
- Own-token (GNO) exposure            : ~$117M   (~51%)
- Other positions                     : ~$21M

Redemption math
- Eligible supply (ex-Gnosis Ltd.)    : ~1,300,000 GNO
- Implied per-token redemption value  : ~$170 GNO
- GNO spot at vote close              : ~$131 GNO
- Discount to per-token treasury      : ~23%

The ~$170 per-token figure is calculated on the liquid leg of the treasury — the majors, stables and other liquid positions — and excludes the own-GNO portion that would unwind into the float in a redemption. The premium-to-spot is what made the proposal arithmetically attractive to redemption-minded holders and what the activist sponsors used to recruit votes.

Mechanism

The Snapshot vote is a governance signal that authorises the DAO's contributors to draft an executable redemption mechanism — distribution of liquid assets pro rata, a claim token for illiquid positions, and a fixed window for opt-in. The exact contract path has not yet been published; the redemption is not yet on-chain. The DAO has previously moved governance outcomes into execution via multisig-coordinated calls rather than a fully autonomous executor, so the next milestone is the redemption mechanism specification on forum.gnosis.io and the on-chain execution transactions that distribute the liquid assets.

Impact

  • Activist precedent for procedural redemption. Earlier RFV-style redemptions (Rook, FEI/Tribe, Aragon's grants-program forced restructuring) either ran outside standard governance or pushed a DAO into emergency restructuring. GIP-151 cleared a quorum-met Snapshot vote with no procedural pause — the first time a treasury-redemption proposal of this size has done so on a household-name DeFi DAO.
  • Treasury risk concentration is the through-line. Roughly half of GnosisDAO's treasury is GNO. A redemption that distributes the ~$111M non-GNO liquid leg leaves the residual treasury heavily reflexive to GNO itself, with implications for any remaining grants, validator operations and Chiado/Gnosis Chain–facing programs the DAO subsidises.
  • Cofounder positions held but didn't carry. Stefan George and Martin Koppelmann publicly opposed redemption on the forum and voted against both proposals. The 49-voter GIP-151 result, carried by a large delegated wallet, shows that on Snapshot a single sufficiently weighty stake can flip a result the founders lost broader debate on — the same pattern that surfaced in the Aave–Sky governance disputes earlier this year.

What to watch

  1. The redemption execution contract. Until a contract address is published and reviewed, the vote is an authorisation, not a payment. Watch forum.gnosis.io for the implementation thread and any independent reviews from Gauntlet, Karpatkey or the DAO's own internal risk contributors.
  2. The opt-in window. Pro-rata redemptions typically run for a fixed period after which unclaimed share reverts to the treasury. The duration and starting block height will determine how much of the eligible 1.3M GNO actually claims.
  3. Treasury custody changes. If liquid assets are pre-positioned in a distribution multisig ahead of opt-in, the signer set and the proxy admin are the highest-trust items in the whole sequence and the place a write-up should land first.
  4. Read-across to other DAOs with widening NAV discount. Aave, Compound, ENS, Lido and others trade governance tokens at varying discounts to underlying balance-sheet value. A clean GIP-151 execution makes the activist play easier to replicate; a messy one makes the founders' "treasury sovereignty" argument easier to make next time.

Context — the second redemption fight in a household-name DAO this year

GIP-151 follows a broader 2026 pattern of activist treasury campaigns moving from forum theatre into clean governance wins. The Aave–Sky standoff earlier this year over revenue allocation, the recent ENS treasury-policy debate, and the ongoing Compound v3 grants-program reductions all rhymed around the same core dispute: who controls the discount between a DAO's market cap and its on-chain balance sheet. GnosisDAO is the first of those debates to land a binding redemption authorisation through standard governance.

Whether the DAO can execute a pro-rata redemption cleanly — and whether the residual GnosisDAO continues funding Gnosis Chain, Circles, the Safe ecosystem and the validator set at current levels — is the open question the next month of forum threads and on-chain transactions will answer.

Sources:

Related stories